安全評測方法 · US

Safety Score 必須公開計算依據。

0–10 分評級把五項證據整合為可比較訊號,協助讀者提出正確問題;它不保證合法性、盈利、償付能力或成功出款。

五項評分因素

以加權證據評分,不依賴宣傳口號。

每項因素為 0–10 分。證據缺失或過期會降低可信度,不會以猜測補足。

01 · 25% OF SCORE

License Quality

Regulator credibility, licence scope, operator identity and the freshness of verification evidence.

02 · 25% OF SCORE

Payout Speed & Reliability

Published processing rules, verification friction, withdrawal limits and documented reliability signals.

03 · 20% OF SCORE

Terms Fairness

Clarity and balance of bonus, account, inactivity, maximum-bet and withdrawal conditions.

04 · 20% OF SCORE

Player Complaint Record

Severity, recency and resolution quality of substantiated complaints, not raw complaint volume alone.

05 · 10% OF SCORE

Overall Safety

A final expert check for ownership transparency, security information and player-protection controls.

0–10 × %

最終分數如何計算

因素分數 × 公開權重,五項結果相加 = Safety Score

INDEPENDENCE

制度化保持獨立

商業合作必須披露,並與評分決定分開。玩家損害、不確定性及經證實投訴永遠比優惠價值重要。

SCORE BANDS

What each level means.

Labels make the number easier to scan, but the underlying factors remain more important than the badge.

  1. 9.0–10Very HighStrong current evidence across every factor.
  2. 8.0–8.9HighStrong evidence with limited material concerns.
  3. 7.0–7.9GoodGenerally positive evidence with checks still required.
  4. 6.0–6.9MediumMixed evidence or meaningful uncertainty.
  5. 0–5.9LowWeak, incomplete or concerning evidence.
評測流程

由證據到發布的四重控制。

01

收集證據

查核營運者、牌照、條款、支付及投訴結果。

02

逐項評分

編輯在看到加權總分前完成五項因素評分。

03

獨立覆核

第二位編輯檢查異常變動、計算及公開說法。

04

發布與監察

牌照、擁有權、條款或投訴有重大變化時重新評測。

COMPARE WITH CONTEXT

See every factor beside the offer.

View Safety Scores